Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAHABAT KHAN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Bail applicant is not responsible for wounds on important parts of the body of the affected person.

1983 P Cr. LJ 2142

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MAHABAT KHAN‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2001‑B of 1981, decided on 12th August, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑----S. 497‑Bail‑Petitioner not attributed injuries on vital parts of body of victim‑Question whether offence, if any, committed falls within ambit of S. 307 or S. 324 needs further inquiry‑Bail allowed, in circumstances.

Rab Nawaz Khan Niazi for Petitioner.

Mr. Arshad for the State.

Date of hearing : 12th August, 1981.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Muhabat Khan in a case under section 307/34, P. P. C., registered at Police Station, Kamar Mushani vide F. I. R. No. 18, dated 12th March, 1981.

The allegations against the petitioner are that he alongwith his brother, namely Muhammad Khan, made murderous assault upon Ghulam Sarwar complainant on 12th March, 1981 in the area of Allah Khair within the limits of Police Station, Kamar Mushani.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injuries on the person of the victim are not on the vital parts, therefore, the question of application of section 307, P. P. C. in the circumstances of the case needs serious consideration.

3. As against this learned counsel for the State has opposed this peti tion. He submits that the alleged offence is punishable with imprisonment for, life.

4. After having considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the question whether the offence, if any, committed by the petitioner would fall within the ambit of section 307, P. P. C. or 324, P. P. C. needs further inquiry. The petitioner is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (rupees ten thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction o A. C., Mianwali.

M.Y.M. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Kakul lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.