Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

REHMAT ALI versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE


Section 3 (2) Qualifications of an application brought before the High Court under Article 199 of the Intra Court Appeal, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), in which at least one appeal arises. The review or a review had appealed to the intra-court against such a request, which was held in the authorized constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199

1983 C L C 1052

[Lahore]

Before Ghulam Mujaddad Mirza and Sardar Mohammad, JJ

REHMAT ALI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants

versus

MEMBER (REVENUE) BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB,

LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents

Intra‑Court Appeal No. 99 of 1981, decided on 24th October, 1982.

Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)‑

‑‑ S. 3 (2)‑Intra‑Court appeal, competency of‑‑Application brought before High Court under Art. 199 of .Constitution of Pakistan (1973) arising out of proceeding in which at least one appeal; revision or one review provided ‑Intra‑Court Appeal against such application, held, not competent‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199.

Shahid Hussain Kadri for Appellants

.

Syed Jamshed Ali for Respondents Nos. 2 to 4.

Date of hearing : 24th October, 1982:

JUDGMENT

SARDAR MUHAMMAD, J

.‑Learned counsel for the respondents has token a preliminary objection that the I. C. A. does not lie. He has taken us through Proviso to subsection (2) of section 3 of the Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, wherein it is provided that appeal shall not be available or competent if the application brought b.‑fore the High Court under Article 199 arises out of any proceedings in which the law applicable pro vided for at least one appeal or one revision or one review to any Court, Tribunal or authority against the original order.

2. Without any dispute, a right of appeal, revision or review was available in this case and the matter was decided in revision firstly by the' Additional Commissioner (Revenue) and then by the learned Member, Board's of Revenue. Learned counsel for the appellants has not been able to controvert this objection.

As the I. C. A. is not competent, the same stands dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Garh More lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.