The complainant's complaint of the approval of the Articles 22A, 154, 188 and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 3, 4 and 302 Qital Ahmed Additional Regional Crimes was that the official Justice of the petition was allowed under Section 22. The AA, the CCPC and the police were directed to investigate the crime outside Pakistan territory, while no federal certificate issued by the federal government was issued, confirming the validity of the allegations. Can't be done without inquiry but the bar is not just extended to the entry. Under FIR 5 154, CCPC and no prerequisite for obtaining such certificate was registered before the registration of FIR under 188, CRPC is a regulatory Was required and can be presented even after the invoice has been submitted to the court of competent jurisdiction. They can be obtained even after submitting the invoice for inquiry. The incident was a blind assassination and all the rows had no weight or relevance to the African state-issued documents, where the alleged crime was committed, which would be answered after a thorough police investigation as it was reported. Both sides were Pakistani nationals and residents of the Quetta Trial Court and the police authorities in Pakistan had the authority to inquire into the matter. The High Court refused to interfere with the order passed by the former state court of peace.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
