Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

REHMAT versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Bail, Applicant's Grant, Charge of Offense under Section 382, PPC for the last 6 months in a trial court without trial, fast hearing, favor of an accused And acknowledge your right to deny it

1983 P Cr. L J 1561

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

REHMAT-----Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1813/B of 1982, decided on 4th August, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

-----S. 497-Bail, grant of-Petitioner, accused of offence under S. 382, P. P. C. in jail for last 6 months without institution of challan in trial Court -Speedy trial, held, right of an accused person and its denial would concede his right to him--Bail allowed in circumstances.

Mian Muzaffar Ahmad for Petitioner.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Rehmat petitioner in a case under section 382, P. P. C. registered at Police Station. Kamoke vide F. I. R No. 65/82 dated 27th February, 1982.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner and others committed robbery and have removed wrist-watch and muffler from the person of Naeem Akhtar, the complainant on 26th February, 1982, in the area of Sheesh Mahal Cinema, Kamoke. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accused namely, Muhammad Ishaque has been released on bail by the trial Court. He further submits that although the petitioner is in jail for the last six months, yet the challan has not been submitted so far.

3. No one has appeared on behalf of the State. It appears that the State is not interested to oppose this application.

4. After going through the file, Wakalat Hussain A. S. I. informs that the challan has not been presented so far. It was prepared but was returned with some objection by the Prosecution Branch.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the A. S. I. I find that although the petitioner is in jail for the last about 6 months, yet the challan has not been submitted. It is well-recognised that speedy trial is the right of an accused person and if it is denied to him, he is justified in asking for bail. In the circumstances of this case I do not fin any reason to refuse him his right. He is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C./Duty Magistrate, Gujranwala.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Mangla lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.