Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ASAF versus STATE


Under Section 497 bail of the Criminal Code (CCPC), the accused along with the applicant committed the robbery and deprived their victims of Rs 500 and Rs 50. In custody, further investigation is required

1983 P Cr. L J 908

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

Master MUHAMMAD ASAF-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1272-B of 1982, decided on 4th August, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

--S. 497-Bail-As per allegation petitioner alongwith co-accused committed robbery and deprived their two victims of Rs. 500 & Rs. 50-According to such victims petitioner was not present on spot and as such took no part in occurrence-Matter, held, required further investigation-Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstance.

Dr. Khalid Ranjha for Petitioner.

Muzaffar Hayat for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Master Muhammad Asif in a case under section 17 of the Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 (VI of 1979) registered at Police Station, Wazirabad City vide F. I. R. No. 185, dated 20-12-1981.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner alongwith the co-accused, committed a robbery and deprived the complainant, of Rs. 50 and Muhammad Ishaque P. W. of Rs. 500.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a false case. He has placed on record copy of the affidavit of the complainant to the effect that the petitioner is innocent and he had not participated in the occurrence. He has also placed on record original affidavits attested by Abdul Rehman and Muhammad Ishaq, eye-witness to the effect that the petitioner is innocent. The complainant Abdul Rehman identified by Muhammad Feroze, A. S. I. owns copy of the affidavit (Annex. C'). The learned counsel for the State has, however, opposed this application on the ground, that it is a case of heinous offence.

4. After hearing the learned counsel I find that according to the complainant and the eye-witnesses, the petitioner was not present on the spot and A had not participated in the occurrence and as such the matter requires further investigation. He is, therefore, released on bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C., Wazirabad.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Tharo Shah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.