Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUSA versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Bail, Applicant's Grant, Accused of Conviction of Adultery, Under Section 10 of the Offense of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979) 4/5 days An FIR was registered late, with no signs of torture on the prosecutor's side, and eventually no semen was reported on vaginal odors: A further investigation case came up, petitioner granted bail (Crime Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10

1983 PCr.LJ 16

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUSA-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1847-B of 1982, decided on 2nd August, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

--S. 497-Bail, grant of-Petitioner, charged for committing offence of Zina, under section 10 of Offence of Zina [Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979)-F. I. R. lodged with delay of 4/5 days, no marks of violence found on person of prosecutrix and finally vaginal swabs not reported stained with semen-Held: A case of further inquiry made out, in circumstances-Petitioner allowed bail-Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 10.

Gulzar Ahmad Qureshi for Petitioner.

C. M. Latif for the State.

Date of hearing : 2nd August, 1982

JUDGMENT

This is an application for bail on behalf of Moosa petitioner in a case under section 10 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hadood) Ordinance, 1979 registered at Police Station Kanganpur vide F.I.R. No. 91 dated 28th May, 1982.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner committed rape upon Mst. Hafeezan four five days before the registration of the case in the area of village Rasulpur.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a false case and the report of the Chemical Examiner with regard to the vaginal swabs is negative. Learned State counsel has, however, opposed this app lication.

4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties I find that there is a delay of 415 days in lodging the F. I. R. no marks of violence were found on the person of the prosecutrix and that the vaginal swabs were found "not stained with semen". In these circumstances I am of the opinion that it is a case of further inquiry. The petitioner is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Kasur.

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Lakimarwat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.