YAR MUHAMMAD versus PROVINCIAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BALOCHISTAN
Section 62 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Request Route Permit Cancel scope Petitioner filed an appeal before the Chairman Provincial Transport Authority in which the Secretary Regional Transport Authority has been directed to allow the applicant to operate his bus. Time table should be issued in favor of It was not complied with and the order of cancellation of the route permit was passed without considering the legal aspect of the case that both orders were in conflict with the Provincial Motor Vehicles Ordinance; it was not complied with when passing an unknown order because the reply The transport authority decided the fate. The transport authority, who has given permission, may cancel or suspend the permit permit for the same period without the direction of any investigation or inquiry which may be ordered by the transport authority only by the transport authority. As permitted by law. And the Rolls Authority did not have JJ's order to issue such order without being investigated or investigated by the relevant transport authority who issued the route permit, despite the relevant records and information of the relevant transport authority not available Despite this, he based his ruling on the party's verbal claim. There was no legal permission and it was not sustainable and was set aside and the transport authority was instructed to decide the matter in accordance with the law The constitutional application was dealt with accordingly.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014