Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KASHMIR TIMBER CORPORATION versus AZAD GOVERNMENT


In Sections 151 and 15 of the High Court, direct applicant of the suit, y, the petitioner is praying for the direct recreation of the suit for recovery of approx. Three crores of rupees, the case will be filed in the District Judge's Court under the law, which has an application for unlimited jurisdiction under section 151 which, in the event of failure to appear in the court of competent jurisdiction. Options not usable.

1983 C L C 677

[Azad J & K]

Before Sardar Muhammad Sharif Khan, Actg. C J

KASHMIR. TIMBER CORPORATION-Plaintiff

versus

AZAD GOVERNMENT-Defendant

Civil Miscellaneous No. 21 of 1982, decided on 6th April, 1982.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-

.-- Ss. 151 & 15--Direct entertainment of suit in High Court- .,y, Applicant praying for direct entertainment of suit for recovery of about'; Three Crores of Rupees-Held, suit under law to be filed in Court of District Judge, which has unlimited jurisdiction-Application under S. 151 not competent and inherent powers not exerciseable in case not pending before Court of competent jurisdiction.

Ch. Fazal Hussain for Appellant.

ORDER

This is an application under section, 151, C. P. C. by the applicant praying therein for a direct entertainment of a suit to be filed for recovery of Rs. 2,92,48,765 claimed as compensation from the Government.

The suit under law is to be filed in the Court of the District Judge which has unlimited jurisdiction in the suits. No application under section 151 C. P. C. is competent for the purpose, it is made to this Court. The inherent powers under section 151 are not exercisable in a case not pending before Court of competent jurisdiction. According to the very application itself, this Court consisting of the Judges, at present, in the High Court, has already dealt with the matter in its writ jurisdiction twice and so also it will not be proper for us to entertain the suit for its trial and determination. Moreover, this is not a case for removal of a suit but for direct institution and this is not lawful. Therefore, the plaint is returned for presentation to a Court having jurisdiction to the matter.

K. M. A. Appeal dismissed,

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Kalam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.