Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHUDA BAKHSH versus MEHR DIN


Section 115 reads with the Amendment Ordinance (XII of 1972), the High Court and the District Judge's review jurisdiction excluded by the District Judge, a second review petition against the District Judge's order, not applicable
1982 C L C 2047

[Lahore]

Before Zakiuddin Pal, J

KHUDA BAKHSH AND OTHERS‑Petitioners

versus

MEHR DIN AND ANOTHER‑ Respondents

Civil Revision No. 474 of 1974, decided on 10th July, 1974.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

‑‑S. 115 read with Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)‑Revision Concurrent jurisdiction of High Court and District Judge‑Revision petition dismissed by District Judge‑Second revision petition against order of District Judge, held, not competent.

Sayed Sardar Shah Bokhari for Petitioners.

ORDER

This civil revision is directed against the order dated 24‑4‑I974. . passed by the learned District Judge, Multan under section 115 of the C. P. C.

2. Under the amended law, the High Court as well as the District Judge, both, have courrent jurisdiction and if the necessary order has been passed under section 115, C. P. C by the learned District Judge, revision petition against the said order would be incompetent.

3. It is contended by the learned counsel that the revision petition itself, before the learned District Judge, was incompetent and as such was liable to be dismissed. I am afraid, this contention cannot be allowed to be raised at this late stage, as the same was never raised before the learned District Judge, who disposed of the revision petition:

4. It is further contended that the amendment introduced by the Law Reforms Ordinance (No. XII) of 1972 in the Civil Procedure Code is ultra vires of the powers of the President, who could not do the same I am afraid, this contention also cannot be allowed to be raised as the same was never raised before the learned District Judge. Even otherwise I am not concerned with the other provisions of the Law Reforms Ordinance, except the amendment of section 115, C. P. C., under which the revision petition has been disposed of by the learned District Judge. Nothing has been shown as to how the present revision petition is competent after the order of the. learned District Judge under the same provision of law has been passed.

The civil revision being incompetent is hereby. dismissed in limine.

M. Y. M Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Akhora Khattak lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.