Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IJAZ AHMAD versus KHADIM ALI


Section 4 324, Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) under PPC Section 9 439 Changing the sentence of a high amended prosecutor, PPC changed one and the session under Section 7 307, PPC The judge increased the exercise of his powers under section 439. A, CCPC's argument that the session judge could not convert a lesser offense into a greater offense in the exercise of jurisdiction and the correct modification order of the session judge, setting aside the reason for the re-hearing. Can direct Sen punishment]

1982 P Cr. L J 1296

[Lahore]

Before Mazharul Haq, J

IJAZ AHMAD‑Petitioner

versus

KHADIM ALT AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Writ Petition No. 2346 of 1982, decided on 30th June, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑--

‑‑ S. 439‑A ‑ Revision (criminal)‑Conversion to higher offence ---Retrial‑Petitioner's conviction under S. 324, P. P. C. altered to one under S. 307, P. P. C. and sentence enhanced by Sessions Judge in exercise of his powers under S. 439‑A, Cr. P. C.‑Conten tion that in exercising revisional jurisdiction Sessions Judge could not have altered lesser offence into a higher offence and could only direct a re‑trial‑Contention, held, correct ‑Revisional order of Sessions Judge, set aside.‑;Sentence].

Ch. Muhammad Anwar Bhinder for Petitioner.

Rashid Aziz Khan, Addl. A.‑G. for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 30th June, 1982.

JUDGMENT

This is a writ petition of Ijaz Ahmad alias Jajji against the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Gujranwala by virtue of which the petitioner's conviction in revision was altered from S. 324, P. P. C. to S. 307, P. P. C. and sentence was enhanced to 5 years R. I. and to a fine of Rs. 5000 in default to two years' R. I. further. In exercising revisional jursdiction, A learned Sessions Judge, could not have altered the lesser offence into higher offence could have only directed a retrial. This petition is, therefore, accepted and the order in revision dated 7th June, 1982 is set aside as a result of which the enhanced sentence shall become inoperative, the original conviction and sentence shall remain intact and the revision shall be heard after. Since the revision has to be heard by the Sessions Judge, I transfer the case from the file of the Sessions Judge, Gujranwala to the Sessions Judge, Gujrat, who will hear the revision under section 439‑A, Cr. P. C. afresh, The parties are directed to appear before the Sessions Judge, Gujrat on 17th June, 1982 for further proceedings. Record of their case is with the office of the Sessions Judge, Gujranwala, it shall be sent to the Court of Sessions Judge, Gujrat before this date.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Garh Maharaja lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.