Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ZAHID HUSSAIN versus SUPERINTENDENT, NEW CENTRAL JAIL, MULTAN


Section 4 of the Pakistan (Entry of Entry) Act 1952 and the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 dents have already sentenced to life imprisonment and any other case on the return of India under consideration of the applicant of the federal government. I don't need it. In the event of independence, the provincial or central government will take any other action

1982 P Cr. L J 1235

[Lahore]

Before Gulbaz Khan, J

ZAHID HUSSAIN‑ Petitioner

versus

SUPERINTENDENT, NEW CENTRAL JAIL, MULTAN

AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Writ Petition No. 9027 of 1980, decided on 5th October, 1980.

Pakistan (Control of Entry) Act (LV of 1952)‑--

‑‑ S. 4 and Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑Detenus after conviction having already served their imprisonment and their matter for repatriation to India under consideration of Federal Government‑Petitioner being not required in any other case set at liberty, in circumstances‑Provincial or Central Government to take any further action in matter.

Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem for Petitioner.

Karamar Nazir Bhandari, A. A.‑G. (Punjab) for Respondents.

Syed Iftikhar Ahmad, Deputy Attorney‑General for the State.

Date of hearing : 5th October, 1980.

ORDER

Mst. Amina Bibi and Mst. Chand Bibi were put to trial for offence under section 4/55/52 (Control of Entry into Pakistan Act). They were convicted, on 17th September, 1978, by a Magistrate 1st Class, Sialkot and sentenced to simple imprisonment for three months each. They have already served their imprisonment. It was stated by the learned Assistant Advocate‑General that the matter of repatriation of the two ladies was under consideration with the Federal Government.

3. Since the two detenus are not required in any case they ate set at liberty. Thereafter, it shall be for the Provincial or the Central Government to take any further action in the matter.

Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Chak Sheza lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.