Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL RAHMAN versus THE STATE


The Punjab Excise Act 1914 Section 61 conviction, the accused has already been sentenced to imprisonment for about 3 weeks, a review petition has come before the High Court more than 8 years ago, when its applicant applied to his head. He was suffering from mental retardation. A sentence by itself, it would not be appropriate to send him to jail for the non-termination of his sentence, in the circumstances, so the applicant has already been sentenced to prison [sentence].

1982 P Cr. L J 457

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J

ABDUL RAHMAN-Petitioner

versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Revision No. 2 of 1972, decided on 28th October,-1980.

Punjab Excise Act (I of 1914)---

-- S. 61-Sentence, reduction in - Accused already undergone imprisonment for about 3 weeks-Revision petition coming up before High Court more than 8,j years after its institution-Peti tioner having suffered mental torture with fear of sentence banging over his head all along in itself a punishment, sending him to Jail for un expired portion of his sentence, held, would not be proper, in circumstances, hence sentence reduced to imprisonment already undergone by petitioner.-[Sentence].

Miss Gulshan Ara Alam for Petitioner.

Ahmad Nawaz for the State.

Date of hearing : 28th October, 1980.

JUDGMENT

Abdur Rehman petitioner was tried under section 61 of the Excise Act by Mr. Yusuf Kamal ; Magistrate First Class, Okara, who by his judgment dated 24th November 1971, convicted him on the said charge and sentenced, him to rigorous imprisonment for three months. His appeal before the Sessions Court having failed, be has come up in revision to this Court.

2. The petition was admitted only to consider the quantum of sentence.

3. The petitioner was convicted by the trial Court on 24th November, 1971 and his sentence was suspended by the Sessions Judge on 26th November, 1971. After the dismissal of his appeal on 18th December, 1971 his sentence was suspended by this Court on 3rd January, 1971. In this way, he has already undergone R. I. for about three weeks. This petition is being heard more than eight and a half years after its institution. During all this period the petitioner suffered mental torture with the fear of sentence banging over his head which by itself is a punishment. After such a long time, it will not be propel to send him to jail for the un expired portion of his sentence, therefore. I reduce his sentence to the term of imprisonment already undergone by him, and with this modification in the sentence the petition, dismissed.

Order accordingly

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Sanjwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.