Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 498 Hall [Murder Case] The applicant is allegedly equipped with a touchband that has struck the victim's lawyer's leg without injuring the wounds on the belt. He was emphasized because of injuries sustained while not being subjected to. The state prosecutor is unable to respond reliably to the arguments of the prosecuting attorney.

1982 P Cr. L. J 27

[Lahore]

Before Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, J

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF-- Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 501/B of 1979 , decided on 24th March, 1979.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1989) ---

-- S. 498 -Hall- [Murder-case]-Petitioner allegedly armed with a hat chet-inflicting a blow on leg of deceased---Counsel for petitioner laying stress on fact of injuries found on leg being not incised wounds and prosecution riot having insisted as to hatchet being used with blunt side-State counsel unable to give arty satisfactory reply to argument of counsel for petitioner-Bail granted in circumstances.

Mushtaq Raj for Petitioner.

C. M. Latif Rawn for A:-G. for the State.

Kh. Muhammad Sharif for the Complainant.

Date of hearing : 24th March, 1979.

JUDGMENT

The allegation against .the petitioner is that he was armed with hatchet and it is with this that he inflicted a blow on the leg of the deceas ed. Learned counsel for the petitioner laid great stress on the fact than the injuries found on the leg were not incised wounds and it is not the pro secution case that the hatchet was used with the blunt side.

2. Learned State Counsel has not been able to give any satisfactory reply to this argument. Hence, the petitioner is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs. 50,000 (rupees fifty thousand only) with one surety in the lik amount to the satisfaction of A, C., Gujranwala.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.