Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHAN BAHADUR versus THE STATE


Applicants convicted of sections 497 and 498 of the Criminal Code (CCPC) have declared simple firearms injuries, even if the defendant acts in the presence of the joint intention of the unlawful assembly to determine whether or not to stand trial. In view of the nature of the persons injured under Section 307, PP, lesser penalties may be decided under C or any other part of the law as well as in the trial.

1982 P Cr. L J 26

[Lahore]

Before K. M. A. Samadani, J

KHAN BAHADUR AND ANOTHER -Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 49/B of 1981. decided on 22nd February. 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

-- Ss. 497 & 498-Bail--Accused petitioners attributed simple fire-arm injuries-Whether accused acted in furtherance of common intention of unlawful assembly--To be determined at trial--- Whether in view of nature of injuries accused liable under S. 307, P. P, C. or under any other section of law calling for lesser penalty-Also to be decided at trial-Accused having remained in custody for ten months and commencement of trial being not in sight, bail allowed.

Malik Rab Nawaz Noon for Petitioners.

Sh. Zamir Hussain for the State.

ORDER

The petitioners have been attributed simple fire-arm injuries. Whe ther they acted in furtherance of the common intention of the unlawful assembly of which they are alleged to have been the members, is a question that remains to 'be determined at the trial. As to whether in view of the nature of the injuries allegedly caused by them they are liable under sections 302 and 307, P. P. C. or under any other section of law calling for lesser penalty remains to be decided also at the trial. Presently, however the circumstances to be taken into consideration are that they have already remained in custody, for ten months now and the commencement of the trial is not in sight. I, therefore, admit the petitioners to bail each in the .sum of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the S. D. M./Duty Magistrate, Rawalpindi.

Appeal dismissed,

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Killa Abdullah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.