Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Writ Petition No. 981 of 1981, decided on 22nd February, 1981.
.‑‑ S. 13 read with Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S. 30‑Eviction‑Contention that Courts below had not appreciated effect of respondent's previous statement that petitioners occupied disputed property as trespassers and could not be treated as statutory tenants in pursuance of S. 30 of Act, property in dispute being neither a house nor a shop‑Matter admitted for consideration, in circumstances.
Akhtar Mir Warsi for Petitioners.
Date of hearing: 22nd February 1981.
Learned counsel inter alia contends that the two tribunals below had no duly appreciated the effect of the previous statements of respondents Nos. and 4 that the petitioners were occupying the disputed property as trespassers; and that the petitioners could not be treated as statutory tenants in pursuance of section 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation Act. 1958 because the property in dispute was. neither a house nor a shop.
2. Admit. Notice.
3. The operation of the impugned order shall remain, suspended meanwhile subject to notice.
4. In view of the nature of this case it shall be heard within six months.
M. Y. M. Case admitted.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer