Fresh Notes to Sections (55 ()) and (a) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VI, R 15 Election Request Verification The Election Tribunal dismissed the election request on the ground that it did not have endorsement. As stated in the Civil Code, Code of Conduct, 1908, even though the candidate filed the latest memorandum along with the signature, under the scope of the election application and / or its certification clause, without the same certificate. By certification / certification, or by any other competent person - himself, VI VI, R 15, did not meet the requirement of verification as per the CPC advice and the Public Representation Act 1976 Made the application unnecessary pursuant to the provisions of H-55 (3), which essentially demanded its dismissal in accordance with the provisions of section 63. (a) where appropriate representation of the People's Act, 1976, The attempt to amend was necessary for the purposes of determining the real issue; the demarcation modification could be ignored; the necessary modification for the dispute / allegation of fraudulent and corrupt practices in the electoral process cannot be considered. The petition faced a natural flaw in the non-compliance of section 55 (3). Under the People's Act, 1976, the candidate could not be allowed to restrain the purpose of law as it was sought; the Supreme Court refused to interfere in the decision passed by the Election Tribunal, filed by the candidate. The request for an application was dismissed
