Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL HAYEE versus GHULAM MURTAZA


Art: ? (3 ()) Receiving leave to appeal the privileges contemplated under the payment of rent is primarily a decision of fact and judicial orders not to be exposed to any legal or factual weakness and Full support is provided through relevant false evidence. West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance (VI of 1959), Section 13 [Question of fact]

1981 S C M R 641

Present : Karam Elahee Chauhan and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ

MAJOR (RETD.) ABDUL H AYEE-Petitioner

Versus

LT.-COL. (RETD.) Raja GHULAM MURTAZA AND OTHERS- Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 224 of 1981, decided on 4th March, 1981.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 6-12-1980, in W. P. 6998/80).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-

---Art: 185(3)-Leave to appeal- Contentions raised considered by Courts below-Point of payment of rent-Essentially one of fact Judgments and orders of Courts below not shown to be suffering from any legal or factual infirmity and fully supported by relevant cogent evidence-Petition for leave to appeal dismissed-West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13.-[Question of fact].

Kh. Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court and Inayat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.

Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and S. M. Chaudhary, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 4th March, 1981.

ORDER

KARAM ELAHEE CHAUHAN, J.-

The petitioner who is a tenant in the property in dispute which is described more fully in the petition was ordered to be evicted, there from by the learned Rent Controller on the ground of default in the payment of rent vide his order dated 14-11-1979. He filed an appeal-which was dismissed by the learned District Judge on 7-5-1980. At that stage he filed a constitutional petition being W. P. 6998/80, but without any success as it was also dismissed on 6-12-1980. He has now come up in a petition for special leave to appeal to this Court,

2. Learned counsel submitted that actually there is no default on the part of his client and even otherwise according to the practice prevalent between the parties he had been paying rent in cash without receipts. All these aspects have been considered by the Courts below and the point of payment of rent being essentially one of fact cannot be interfered with as the judgments and orders of the Courts below have not been shown to us to suffer from any legal or factual infirmity and are fully supported by relevant cogent evidence, and the facts and the circumstances of the case) referred to therein.

3. The result is that this petition is dismissed hereby in limine. Learned counsel requested for some grace period to vacate the property. In the interest of justice we grant him three months time. He undertakes to keep on paying the rent regularly. He further undertakes that he shall vacate the property voluntarily and without causing any damage thereto. Orders accordingly.

Petition dismissed,

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Rahimyar Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.