Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ASSISTANT ENGINEER, MACHINERY MAINTENANCE SUB DIVISION NO. 2, HYUERABAD versus HAROON NISA


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 The transfer of the case from one Labor Court to another in a proper ground application, caused the action in the jurisdiction of the Labor Court, which has already overcome the jurisdiction. In the Ground Ground, applicants' HQ H ground shifted, in the circumstances, not sufficient for transfer

1981 P L C 334

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind]

Present: Z. A. Channa, Appellate Tribunal

ASSISTANT ENGINEER, MACHINERY MAINTENANCE SUB‑DIVISION No. 2,

HYUERABAD

Versus

HAROON NISA AHD 2 OTHERS

Application No. KAR‑746 of 1980, heard on 2nd November, 1980.

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑

----S. 38‑Transfer of case from one Labour Court to another‑Sufficient ground ‑ Application filed 6 years earlier before Labour Court K‑‑Cause of action arose within jurisdiction of Labour Court K which already seized of matter‑Respondents residing within its jurisdiction‑Transfer sought for on ground, that headquarter of applicant shifted to H‑Ground, in circumstances, held, not sufficient for transfer.

Syed Ahmed Faruqui for Applicant.

Date of hearing : 2nd November, 1980.

ORDER

This is an application by the Assistant Engineer, Maintenance Sub -Division, praying for the transfer of Applications Nos. 26/74, 27/74 and 28/74, all under section 50 (1), I. R. O. from the learned Fifth Labour Court at Karachi to the learned Sixth Labour Court at Hyderabad. The sole ground on which the transfer application has been based is that the Machinery Maintenance Sub‑Division, which was originally based at Karachi, has sine: been shifted to Hyderabad and all the employees of that Sub‑Division accordingly are now working at Hyderabad. This cannot be considered to be a sufficient ground for the transfer of the application in question. It appears that the said applications were filed in the year 1974, but because of appeals having been filed and subsequently the matters having been taken to the High Court in the exercise of its Constitutional jurisdiction, the said applications unfortunately continue to be pending The transfer of these applications from the Court at Karachi to the Labour Court at Hyderabad would only further delay the disposal of those applications which already have been hanging fire since the past over six years. Moreover, admittedly, all the three respondents are residing at Karachi and it would be difficult for them, being workmen, to perused their applications at Hyderabad. Finally the cause of action admittedly arose within the jurisdiction of the Karachi, Labour Court.

I, accordingly, see no justification for transferring these applications to the Labour Court at Hyderabad. The transfer application is rejected.

Application rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.