Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAZIR AHMAD versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER


Section 20 Revised Jurisdiction Once the Permanent Traffic Agreement has been issued, the Settlement Jurisdiction cannot use the Settlement Jurisdiction. There may be fraud committed in obtaining PTD settlement authorities, then there can be no dispute as the matter continues even after the most vigorous proceedings have been issued. Image Authorities in PTD do not have the authority to correct maulvi errors 13 and the grieving person can get a declaration in civil court only (jurisdiction)

1981 C L C 1644

[Lahore]

Before Shameem Hussain Kadri, J

NAZIR AHMAD‑Petitioner

versus

ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

AND 4 others--‑Respondents

Writ Petition No. 1165/R of 1974, decided on 24th March, 1980.

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)‑‑ . .

‑‑‑ S. 20‑Revision‑Jurisdiction‑‑Permanent Trafer Deed once. issued, revisional jurisdiction cannot be exercised by Settlement authorities ‑Contention that fraud having been committed in obtaining P.T.D. Settlements authorities could re‑open case‑Held: No quarrel with such proposition since fraud vitiates most solemn proceeding yet after issuance of P. T. 13. no power left in Settlement authorities to correct clerical mistakes in P. T. D. and aggrieved person could only seek declaration in civil Court. ‑‑(Jurisdiction‑ Fraud].

Muhammad Anwar Khan v. M. A. Wasti, Settlement and Rehabilita tion Commissioner, Peshawar and others 1975 S C M R 372 ; Qutubuddin and utters v. Sardar Hidayat Ullah Khan Mokal and another 1976 S C M R 524 ; Chief' Settlement Commissioner, Lahore v. Muhammad Fazil Khan and others P L D 1975 S C 331 ; Aminuddin v. Settlement Commissioner and others 1973 S C M R 624 and Syed Murid Hussain Shah v. Mufti Muhammad Yousaf Ali and another 1974 S C M R 8 ref.

Rata Afrasiab Khan for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondent No, 1.

Major Ishaq Muhammad Khan for Respondent No. 2.

Muhammad Tuful Dhami for Respondents Nos. 3 to 5.

Dates of hearing 12th and 15th March, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Fateh Jang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.