Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAEED FATIMA versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 bail, applicant's grant, controversial charge of abduction and marriage with one of the abductors allegedly appearing before the alleged incident. Is done Guaranteed, in the circumstances

1981 P Cr. L J 1257

[Lahore]

Before Sardar Mohammad, J

Mst. SAEED FATIMA-----Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2101-B of 1981, decided on 24thAugust, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-------

-- S. 497-Bail, grant of-Petitioner, controverting charge of her abduction and further producing Nikahnama showing her marriage with one of alleged abductors before alleged date of occurrence-- Held --- In view of obvious contradiction case it for further inquiry--Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstance.

Malik Allah Yar Khan for Petitioner.

Mohammad Akbar Cheema for the State.

ORDER

A case was registered on the statement of Ashiq, father of the petitioner, under section 16, Hudood Ordinance, 1979 on 4thMarch, 1981 about the abduction of the petitioner, It was alleged that Ansar Ali Khan, Safdar Ali and Nawazish Ali had abducted Mst. Saeed Fatima petitioner. After recovery, Mst. Saeed Fatima contradicted the contents of the F. I. R. and stated that she was neither abducted and is nor being detained illegally and that she has married Mohammad Ansar Khan, one of the accused named in the F. I. R.

2. The case of the petitioner is that she is wedded wife of Ansar Khan and their Nikah was performed on 7thJanuary, 1981 and that the present case has been lodged falsely because she had married Ansar Khan against the will of her father.

3. Arguments heard. According to the F. I. R., the occurrence is stated to have taken place on 7thFebruary, 1981 while the Nikahnama produced in Court shows that the petitioner had entered into Nikah with Ansar Khan on 7th January 1981. Obviously, the petitioner married Ansar Khan before the alleged date of occurrence. This fact, of course, will be determined and adjudicated upon during the trial but at the present stage, because of this contradiction, a case for further inquiry is made out. The petitioner shall be released on bail provided she furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C, Sargodha.

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Kalam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.