MUHAMMAD versus NAZIR AHMED

Natural justice applicants are not connected to the inquiry nor have the respondents been given the opportunity to present their case before approving the additional water supply in accordance with Section 68 principles, participated in the applicant's water supply. Yes, they cannot be reduced without giving them a chance to be heard. Violating the principles of natural justice, putting things aside

1981 C L C 912

[ Lahore]

Before Muhammad Zafarullah, J

MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER‑‑Petitioners

versus

NAZIR AHMED AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents

Writ Petition No. 1525 of 1981, decided on 31st May 1981.

Canal and Drainage Act (VIII of 1873)‑-----

‑‑ S. 68‑Principles of natural justice‑Petitioners being not associ ated with enquiry nor given chance to present their case before sanctioning additional water supply to respondent‑Share of water supply of petitioners, held, cannot be reduced without giving them a chance to be heard‑Order of Canal Officer being violative of principles of natural justice, set aside, in circumstances.

Rana Abdul Majid and Abdur Rehman Cheema for Appellants.

Muhammad Zahid Abbassi for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 31st May, 1981.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

immigration advocate from Dadu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team