Find a Lawyer

MST. BANO versus SULEMAN BHUTTO

Sections 340 and 342 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for False Applicant petitioner submitted that Section HA had released two of the three dentons after receiving notice of the case and that the third case. Still in prison. A case was registered for FIR registration, which led the petitioner to appear before the concerned DPO along with a copy of the complaint and a High Court order which was passed by the police station DPO. May I direct the applicant's FIR The concerned police station should also be directed to withdraw the section HO and conduct a fair inquiry against them by a neutral officer, not below the rank of Inspector.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• MUHAMMAD LAEEQ v. SINDH ALKALIES LIMITED 2009 CLD 104
• AZIZ SHAH v. State 2009 YLR 106
• Mst. RUBINA v. State 2009 PCrLJ 107
• NETWORK LEASING CORPORATION LIMITED v. NSA-CTI CONSORTIUM 2009 CLC 108
• UMERTIAZ KHAN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 112
• HAJI AMIN v. PAKISTAN TRADING CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD, 2009 PLD 112
• TARIQ SHAH v. State 2009 YLR 112
• IFTIKHAR AHMED JATT v. MUHAMMAD JAVED 2009 CLC 113

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Noorpur nooranga lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes