Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM JILANI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB


Arts 41 and 45, Presidential Succession Order (PO 13 of 1978) and Prison Rules, 1978, r 104 (Prison Manual) in relation to the legality of detention or apology, emphasizing the applicant's mercy request. I can't find any good reason. The authority has to examine it in its full legal context, which the Superintendent of Prison does not belong to the President's de facto or de jure authority and only needs to see that he received the order from the proper quarter by discovery and imprisoned. The manual option cannot be collectively challenged in an action initiated after an apology, grant grant or refusal to grant, holding, filing a mercy petition as in the scope of the warrant proceedings. Is.

1981 C L C 716

[Lahore]

Before Shafi‑ur‑Rehman, J

Malik GHULAM JILANI‑Petitioner

versus

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB AND 6 OTHERS‑Respondents

Writ Petition No. 1205 of 1979, decided on 17th March, 1979.

(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

Arts. 41 & 45, President's Succession Order (P. O. 13 of 1978) and Prison Rules, 1978, r. 104 (Jail Manual)‑Petitioner on strength of mercy petition, cannot get a substantial cause with regard to lawful authority of detaining authority or pardoning authority to be examined in its full legal perspective‑Superintendent Jail not concerned with de facto or de jure authority of President and required to see only that he received an order from appropriate quarter through hierarchy provided and prescribed in Jail Manual‑Power to pardon, grant of abeyance or refusal to grant, held, cannot be collaterally challenged in proceedings started after filing mercy petition such being within scope of quo warranto proceedings.

(b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑Arts. 41 & 45 read with President's Succession Order (P. O. 13 of 1978) and Prison Rules, 1978, r. 104‑Authority of President qua mercy petition‑Intact and his de facto office prima facie found established by existence of de jure office, colour of authority or title, physical possession, public recognition, reputation and existence of revolutionary Government.

Nasirullah Khan Babar v. Chief of Army Staff, G. X. Q., Rawalpindi and another P L D 1979 Pesh. 23 ref.

Aitzaz Ahsan for Petitioner.

Date of hearing : 17th March, 1979.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Guddu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.