Find a Lawyer

MUKHTARUL OMAR versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN

Sections 8 and 9 There is no limit to the rent control limit during fair rent, fixation and increase rent control, taking into account the factors given in Section 8 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979. Or raise the rent by Rs 1000 and after that period when the rental application was given at appropriate rent, if default, only up to 10% in terms of Ordinance Section 9 of Section 8 of the Indus Renting Ordinance. May be extended, 1979 was free while on the determination of fair rent, the rent controller, apart from the four factors mentioned in section 8 of the ordinance. Space, about the environmental value and the buyers attention should also consider rules

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• KHADIM HUSSAIN v. State 2009 PLD 198
• ZONAL LABOUR UNION LAKHRA through Zonal Chairman v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Water and Power 2009 CLC 200
• QADIR KHAN MANDOKHAIL WELFARE TRUST v. CHAIRMAN, K.P.T. 2009 PLC(CS) 201
• Mufti MUHAMMAD SHARIF SARKI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Government of Sindh, Auqaf, Religious, Minorities Affairs, Zaka 2009 PLD 203
• AL-AZIZ ROUTE TRANSPORT CO v. ASKARI LEASING LTD 2009 CLD 204
• ZAHEERUDDIN BABER v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2009 CLD 209
• RIND v. State 2009 YLR 209
• LAL MUHAMMAD alias HAJI LALOO v. State 2009 PLD 212

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

solicitors from Lawrence pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes