Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Second Appeal from Original Order No. 290 of 1975, decided on 16th October, 1979.
S. 13(3) (a) (ii)‑Eviction‑Premises held by a firm‑A firm has a separate existence from its partners though it does not acquire a, corporate status‑Firm's existence being different from that of its partners for purposes of S. 13(3) (a) (ii) of Ordinance, words for his own occupation' cannot be relegated to any of its partners or their sons‑Premises owned by a firm, held, can only be got vacated for use by firm and not for use of a son of any partner.
Akhtar All v. Umatul Islam P L D 1979 S C 816 and Messrs Fankson & Co. v. Muhammad Hussain P L D 1973 Notes 141 at p. 213 fol.
Miss 1. Ali Muhammad v. Muhammad Shafi P L D 1971 S C 494; Dr. Pershotem v. Ferozeshah and others P L D 1962 Kar. 293; Motal Bai v. Abdul Aziz and others P L D 1968 Kar. 635; Mr, B. A. Sheikh v. The Custodian, Evacuee Property, West Pakistan and another P L D 1960 S C 330 Yaqoob v. Additional Ejectment Commissioner, Karachi 1973 S C M R 116 and Surgan & Company v. Landhu Ram Bal Kishan Das A I R 1941 Nag. 105 ref.
A. R. Shaukat Ali and M. Yunus Bhatti for Petitioner.
Ch. Muhammad Iqbal for Respondent.
Dates of hearing: 8th and 10th October, 1979.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer