Find a Lawyer

COOPER & CO. LTD. THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus LAUREL NAVIGATION (MAURITIUS) LTD.

Sections 12, 42 and 54 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 202 Agent, to execute the expense of the expense of the shipping agency's contract, the establishment of office by the agency and the carrying out of the agency's business. Infrastructure needed for A temporary injunction to prevent the termination of the agency by principal justification cannot be made by the agent as such, the agent's interest in such agency as a commission or indemnity shall not itself be of interest. The order of such expenditures by the agent will not guarantee immunity. In lieu of replacement relief, the agency will generally consider the compensation to be appropriate for illegal termination and in the circumstances the application for a temporary injunction was dismissed.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• HABIB BANK LTD. through Assets Management (ARM) International Division v. MUHAMMAD NAVEED SOOMAR 2009 CLD 354
• H & B GENERAL TRADING COMPANY through Director v. INTERNATIONAL MARKETING COMPANY through Proprietor 2009 CLC 354
• IKHTIYAR v. State 2009 PCrLJ 355
• TANVEER SIDDIQUI v. MUHAMMAD RASHID 2009 PLD 356
• MUHAMMAD USMAN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 359
• ABDUL QAYYUM KHAN v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Federal Secretary Ministry of Interior, Interior Division, Pa 2009 PLD 361
• BADRUDDIN v. BUKHARI MOTORS 2009 PLD 366
• MEHRAB v. State 2009 PCrLJ 367

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

patent advocate from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes