Article 15 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), OI, R-10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Delegation Determination of Title Rental Controller, The applicant's mother had jurisdiction before her co-owner in the premises And the applicant had filed the petition. In addition to the dismissal proceedings and the determination of the suit property holder's title, the Lower Appellate Court dismissed the application simultaneously and validated the appeal filed by the applicants if such application was allowed by the applicant. On the go, this would be equivalent to expanding the scope of Sindh's leasing ordinance. , 1979 The controller's jurisdiction over the rent was limited and the rent controller could not be granted regular litigation because available to the civil court issues regarding the title and validation of the gift given by the applicant. Was. It is favored by the applicant's mother, who was formerly the co-owner of PK, Rupert, Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance was outside the scope of 1979, and the rent controller has no inquiry into such matters. Could not pass, the rent controller could not legally decide on the issue of gift justification in favor of the applicant nor reopen the settlement case. The order that after the withdrawal of the final route, the two courts were in accordance with the following orders of law and there was no legal error that could guarantee the intervention of the High Court in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. Was deleted
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
