MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus BOARD OF REVENUE, SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION SINDH, KARACHI
IX of Section Contract42 Contract Act (XX72), Section 1111 Civil Code of Civil Procedure (VV 1908), O VII, R 11 Plaintiff's dismissal, non-filing of lawsuit was the tenant in the plaintiff's property Was. The Rent Controller was also excluded from complying with the withdrawal order approved by the plaintiff, which opposed the withdrawal proceedings by the lawyer appointed by the Special Counsel of the same lawyer. The title was given to the defendant regarding the source suit property. That the power of attorney was terminated when he was executed by the plaintiff in favor of his agent for a specific and limited purpose and ended the same day when the possession of the property was handed over to the plaintiff by process. ? The plaintiff of the court did not assign any new power to her attorney so that she could appear before the court for the latest reason for signing, verifying and prosecuting the case. Such a case was not properly presented by the plaintiff's lawyer and he did not own the authority to file a lawsuit without a lawsuit, nor was the plaintiff against section 42 of the Special Relief Act 1877 The defendant had no legal role to play in maintaining the case, as the landlord and tenant were related. The parties have already reached the conclusion, that after the expulsion of the claimant from the claimant's property, the plaintiff had no legal status in the property, the suit filed by the claimant under section 42 of the Special Relief Act, 1877 Neither was properly presented nor could they be cared for.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
