Find a Lawyer

QAMARUZAAMAN KHAN versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN

The application for collection of Section 9 and 10 suit loan amounts claimed that the suit property mortgage documents were forged because their predecessor was not alive at the time of the loan approval and execution of the documents. I was able to separate the defendants from the three conflicting dates of their predecessor's death - the defendant's death date - was a good question that went to the root of the foregoing case, could not be resolved without recording the evidence. Holiday applications for defense were accepted in principle \ r. n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• Haji ABDUL KARIM through Attorney v. FLORIDA BUILDERS (PVT.) LTD. KARACHI 2009 YLR 451
• MUHAMMAD ADNAN MALIK v. State 2009 PCrLJ 456
• ACE SECURITIES (PRIVATE) LTD v. Dr. ABDUL HAKIM ABRASH 2009 MLD 459
• Mrs. BADAR RAHIM v. HAMMAD ASIF DOSSLANI 2009 CLC 459
• JALIL AHMED v. CONTROLLER OF RENT, KARACHI 2009 YLR 461
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. BOARD OF REVENUE, SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION SINDH, KARACHI 2009 YLR 466
• M. AYUB v. FEDERATION OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Government o 2009 CLC 466
• ZULFIQAR v. State 2009 PCrLJ 467

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

law firms from Haveli Lakha lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes