O VI, R 17 The plaintiff's new relief amended, adding to the plaintiff's attempt to recover the money only on the grounds that he had paid the defendant against the execution agreement in his favor and the trial. During the hearing, the plaintiff also intended to include the relief regarding the specific performance of the contract to sell the plates raised by the defendant that such relief could not be included because the plaintiff himself Had just given up such assistance, Valdetti the plaintiff terminated the contract itself and later could not claim specific performance as per the agreement. Were In the event of infringement, the parties agreed to claim damages from each other instead of seeking specific performance, as the contract itself was terminated by the plaintiff, a valuable right imposed on the defendant, which the plaintiff sought in the plaintiff. The proposed amendment could not be stripped away. Since filing the suit, the suit property has not shown any interest and was only interested in R. The amount of the deferred settlement and the fidelity to the damages, the defendant rightfully claimed, was due to the increase in the value of the property. The proposed amendment was sought from the plaintiff's conduct not to exceed the board; under equity he was not entitled to be acquitted by the plaintiff.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
