Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAMID AKBAR ALIAS QASIM versus STATE

RR 243 and 248 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), granting B-Class to the Prisoner Pledged, under Section 324/353/34, meant that the applicant was accustomed to a better lifestyle and earned a bachelor's degree in computing and information science. Degree. The system by which he was entitled to a better class in prison would be subject to a prisoner given in Rule 248, Pakistan Prison Rules, because his education reflects his social status and lifestyle. Which shows that he was addicted. The residential high court, while allowing the application, directed the jail authorities to provide B-class facilities to the applicant. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• ABDUL MUJEEB PATEL v. PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY through Administrator 2009 MLD 510
• UNITED BANK LTD. v. Mrs. JAMEELA MUMTAZ 2009 CLD 513
• MUSHEER AHMED BHATTI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary to Government of Sindh 2009 MLD 515
• SAIFULLAH KHAMISANI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2009 PLC(CS) 518
• ALI MUHAMMAD v. State 2009 PCrLJ 521
• Agha MASIHUDDIN v. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, PREVENTIVE COLLECTORATE, KARACHI 2009 PTD 523
• MUHAMMAD YOUNUS v. State 2009 PCrLJ 526
• SARFRAZ AHMED v. State 2009 YLR 527

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Naukot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes