Section 9 (c) Defamation of Evidence, The reduction of the Council for the accused, submitted that the accused had been in constant prison for more than 13 years. That he will not challenge the conviction of the accused and it is requested that the lawyer appearing for the state has been requested to reduce the punishment imposed on the accused and no objection has been raised. That the accused has already passed through the accused, who has been in custody since the last 13. Sal, a first offender, had shown his remorse and repentance as the defendant had served more than 13 years in prison, so the gentleman's appeal filed by the accused was not suppressed and his conviction. Was retained. However, the total punishment for the accused was reduced to 12 years from the life imprisonment RI. RI and fines were also reduced from one million to one lakh rupees, the accused would also be entitled to benefit of Section 382B, the PC extended it. Exemptions, if any, according to the trial court and jail rules, will be entitled to benefit \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
