Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus SHAGUFTA BEGUM


Section 7 and Schedule of Divorce Marriage dissolution - In deciding whether or not the marriage is desirable, the court must decide whether the reconciliation efforts have failed or not, so serious that the spouse is within the limits set by God. There is no possibility of harmony and living. The benefits received by the husband do not have the power to support that the wife, the wife, must come out with compulsory, reasonable and reasonable reasons for obtaining her release, such as marriage to the general court, to Islam. Unity is not compelled to force parties to lead a hateful life

1981 C L C 143

[Lahore]

Before M. S. H. Qureshi, J

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB‑Petitioner

versus

Mst. SHAGUFTA BEGUM AND ANOTHER‑‑Respondents

Writ Petition No. 10706 of 1980, decided on 11th November, 1980.

West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964}‑‑

‑ S. 7 & Sched. ‑‑ Marriage ‑ Dissolution of‑‑Khula'‑Court, in deciding whether khula deserved, to see whether efforts at reconciliation failed whether rift, so serious that there remains no possibility of spouses living in amity and within limits prescribed by God and if wife willing to return benefits received by her from husband‑No authority to support that in order to recover her release, wife must come out with logical, objective and sufficient reasons such as would satisfy ordinary Court‑Marriage in Islam does not conceive of forcing parties to live in a hateful union. [Khula ‑Muhammadan Law].

For grant of khula , therefore, all that is required is that there should be the fear that the spouses would not live within the limits prescribed by God.

In deciding whether khula' is deserved, the Court has to see whether efforts at reconciliation have failed, whether the rift is so serious that there remains no possibility of the spouses living in amity and if the wife is willing to return the benefits she has received from the husband. There is no authority to support that in order to secure her release, the wife must come out with logical, objective and sufficient reasons such as would satisfy the ordinary Court. All that the Judge is required to do is to see if according to his appreciation of situation his conscience is satisfied that there is no possibility of the parties living in harmony. For, forcing the parties to live to a hateful union is not in accord with the concept of marriage in Islam. No Judge could possibly take upon himself the responsibility of forcing the parties into a situation which leaves them no choice but to go astray or to adopt a sinful life.

Mst. Balqis Fatima v. Najm‑ul‑Ikram Qureshi P L D 1959 Lah. 566; Mst. Khurshid Bibi v. Baboo Muhammad Amin P L D 1967 S C 97; Holy Qur'an, V. 2:229; Shah Wali Ullah on; AI‑Musawwa‑min‑Abadith‑al‑Muatta, Vol. II, p. 160 and Ameer Ali's Digest on Muhmmadan Law, 7th Edn Vol. II, p. 467 ref.

Abdul Aziz Quershi for Petitioner.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Daharki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.