By delay of the prosecution's testimony by investigating the approval of a further 16 hours delay in filing the FIR, section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 147, 148, 149 and 109 Related statements were not specified. Approximately 6/7 days later, the officer, who is said to have been a witness to the incident, raised serious suspicion of witnessing his presence at the scene of the incident. The complainant did not challenge the nominee in the FIR by moving the petitioner to join them, as the police report shows that the accused in the challan were falsely implicated by the complaining party and the accused. Weapons were not recovered and hostilities were reported between the parties, in which case they were successful in dealing with further investigation
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
