Plaintiffs' attorney power of section 39 and 42 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), sections 202 and 203 of the document was sought by the plaintiff to declare that the transfer of the suit property in favor of the defendants by his counsel. The fraudulent and fraudulent agent based on the fraudulent receipt the plaintiff acquired interest in the suit property forming part of the agency in the sense of section 202 of the Contract Act, 1872, the plaintiff could not revoke the authority from his own work. In the case the plaintiff invested in the fact of a general authority attorney. The act of law contained in section 202 of the Contract Act, 1972, was entered into by the plaintiff himself in the act of entering into the fact of the attorney of the general authority and in the suicide contract, as the act of law would have to bear. The cancellation of such power of attorney contained in section 202 of the Contract Act, 1872 was not lawful. The general attorney could not withstand the influence of the general attorney's authority given by his authority, on the basis of power. The lawyers withdrew in favor of the defendants under the law, which proved that they were many buyers after paying compensation. Consideration of the purchase of the suit property cannot be allowed to defeat the rights of the defendants in the property except for the reasons that they purchased the suit property. Suite property was purchased for good faith. Neither the fraud nor the illegal nor can it be canceled under the circumstances the suit was dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
