HAJI MUHAMMAD YAQOOB AKHTAR versus HABIB BANK LTD.
Sections 9, 10, 12 and 22 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Request for Recovery of OV, R20 Suite Loan Appeal suit for separation of former party decree dismissed by the plaintiff bank The Defendant filed a petition for the separation of the previous Order After the Banking Court rejected the request, the Defendant filed an appeal against the decision of the Banking Court which stated that it was properly submitted. In the present case, OV, R 20 will be the rule under the basic provisions of CPC. Attraction to the service order by publication was not generally accompanied by an order of issuance of summons when the three modes were not simultaneously adopted and the service was not affected by the two processes. , Must not be ordered mechanically without publication. Before serving as a news-oriented publication, the court had a duty to make up its mind on the facts of the case. The ND found that despite the plaintiff's best efforts, defendant could not be released for the reasons that he had avoided serving with the purpose of obstructing the litigation, before ordering publication. It should have satisfied itself that all the procedures required for the prosecution of the defendants and the pre-trial court, a judicial tribunal or even a quasi-judicial tribunal, were entrusted with the duty to appear before them. They needed to knowingly and subsequently take action before determining the valuable rights of the parties involved. Except before this, the proper use of the mind on this matter is
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
