MUHAMMAD YAMEEN versus MUHAMMAD YASEEN

Section 30 Notices The communication error in the history of PTD was held, if the notice is found to be valid under section 30, it will not give false notice.

1981 C L C 1706

[Karachi]

Before Z. C. Valliani, J

MUHAMMAD YAMEEN‑Petitioner

versus

MUHAMMAD YASEEN‑Respondent

Second Appeal No. 113 of 1976, decided on 12th April, 1981

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)‑

‑‑‑‑ S. 30‑Notice‑Mere mistake in communication of date of P. T. D., held, would not render notice under S. 30 invalid if notice otherwise found to be valid.

Muhammad Qamar v. Abdul Majeed and others Second Appeal No. 162 of 1980 ref.

Matloob Hussain Siddiqui for Petitioner.

Ram Chand Rangwani for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 29th March, 1981..

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

us immigration advocates from Bhuawana lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team