UNITED BANK LIMITED versus FATEH HAYAT KHAN TAWANA
Section 8 (3) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Second Implementation Application Implementing Section 48 and AXXI, R11 The order of the preceding amount was approved by the Banking Court on 1 201 1981 and for the execution of the decree The first application was filed on 27 6 1983, then another application was filed on 16th 1989 as the first application was signed to record as fresh application was filed and the second was excluded on this basis. It was submitted that the order passed by the Banking Court was not disposed of in the court order, as the first execution petition maintained by the High Court was legal. The second execution petition, dated 16th 198 1989, must be acknowledged in connection with or related to the court's finding of the legality and effect of the proceedings. The meaning of judicial orders in relation to such proceedings were neither decisive nor the statement or name given to the proceedings by either party, therefore, the statements made by the prosecutors in the execution of the proceedings, statements are unnecessary. After that was granted, the execution petition filed by the order taker was considered as a hearing which was allowed before the court to appeal the judgment on the merit.
