Find a Lawyer

MST. GUL KHATOON ALIAS GUKKI versus STATE

The basic reason why the 49th amendment code (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/147/148/149 bail was denied to the accused before the accusation of bail is now the main reason The accused was producing a lactating baby with him in prison from one to 1 1/2 years of age, according to records, now the baby was two years and three months old and could not be guaranteed due to breastfeeding. The child in prison could only be allowed to be an accused if the child was under two years of age. Admittedly, the child was more than two years old and thus the accused woman did not have any fresh availability for the grant of bail. Accordingly, the accused was denied bail.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. State 2009 MLD 30
• SANTOSH KUMAR BARWANI v. ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR, KARACHI 2009 YLR 32
• ABRAR ARMED v. Sheikh ZAHOOR AHMED 2009 CLC 32
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. SHAH MURAD SUGAR MILLS through Factory General Manager 2009 PLC 33
• NASIR HAYAT v. State 2009 MLD 37
• TAJ MUHAMMAD alias TAJAN v. State 2009 YLR 38
• ATTAULLAH v. SANAULLAH 2009 PLD 38
• KHAS TEXTILE MILLS v. MUHAMMAD ABBAS 2009 PLC 39

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

lawer from fb area from Tando Adam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes