Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAJID ALI versus PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT WOMEN\'S COLLEGE KARACHI


Article 199 (1) (a) (i) College Petitioner Student Directive to Do Something by College Petitioner Student Applying for Admission to the Next Higher Class 13 12 1978 Respondent (Principal) College Students Fixing date for admission up to 13 years Failed several attempts to obtain admission for outsourcing till 12 12 1978 and 15 12 8 1978 University on payment of extension fee of admission to all affiliated colleges 28 8 1978 As expected, the respondent (Principal) applied the double standard for admission to the college - one for college students and the other for outsiders and for longer. Ni kept open interior for people and such a course is certainly hazardous due to equal treatment with outsiders for the college students adopted its own policy independently for College Admissions

1981 C L C 1255

[Karachi]

Before Abdul Kadir Shaikh, C. J. and S. A. Nusrat, J

MAJID ALI‑Petitioner

versus

PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT WOMEN'S COLLEGE,

KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Constitutional Petition No. D‑1695 of 1978, decided on 14th March, 1979.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑----

‑‑ Art. 199 (1)(a)(i)‑Direction to do something required by law -Petitioner student of College applying for admission to same College in next higher class on 13‑12‑1978‑Respondent (Principal) fixing date for admission for College students up to 13‑12‑1978 and for outsiders up to 15‑12‑1978‑Petitioner failing in various attempts to secure admission‑University extending date of admission in all affiliated Colleges up to 28‑12‑1978 on payment of late fee‑Held, respondent (Principal) applied double standard for admissions to College i.e. one for students of College and another for outsiders and keeping admission for outsiders open to a longer period and such course definitely disadvantageous to students of same College for not having been treated at par with outsiders‑Independent policy of her own for admission to College adopted by respondent (Principal) in disregard of extension granted by University, held, without lawf4l author ity‑Respondent directed to accept and dispose of petitioner's application for admission. [Educational institutions].

Faizuddin for Petitioner.

Abdul Sattar Shaikh, Addl. A.‑G. for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 14th March, 1979.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Thari Mirwah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.