Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAJID versus IMAMUDDIN


Section 13 (3) (a) (U) reads with the Sindh Rental Premises Ordinance (XVII of 19791, s: 15 (2) (vii)) about 1 year before the landlord's requirement Empty and rented out. Once again, the debate over whether the landlord's son could do business using the cabin was stopped; evacuation could be made due to personal need for fresh action, even if the house. The landlord first gets possession of the house and has to re-run it.

1981CLC 1091

[Karachi]

Before Sajjad Ali Shah, J

Haji MAJID‑--Appellant

versus

Haji IMAMUDDIN‑--Respondent

First Rent Appeal No. 20 of 1979, decided on 9th December, 1980.

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (V of 1959)‑---

---S. 13 (3) (a) (ii) read with Sind Rental Premises Ordinance ‑(XVII of 1979), S. 15 (2) (vii)‑‑Landlord earlier enhancing rent or shop in dispute from time, to time‑Contention that landlord's requirement of shop for his son in such circumstances not bona fide repelled‑Held, demand for higher rent does not per se cast any doubt about personal bona fide requirement, if independently proved.

Rafiq Ahmad v. Ch. Abdul Rehman 1980 S C M R 772 rel.

(b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (V of 1959)‑‑

‑‑ S. 13 (3) (a) (ii) read with Sind Rental Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S. 15 (2) (vii)‑Landlord's requirement of premises in good faith for personal. use‑Landlord, held, can choose to pick one of his shops for such purpose‑‑Contention that landlord has other shop which can be got vacated, repelled.

Punjab Hardware v. Wazir Ali P L D 1976 Kar. 233 ref.

(c) West Pakistan. Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

‑‑ S. 13 (3) (a) (U) read with Sind Rental Premises Ordinance (XVII of 19791, S: 15 (2) (vii)‑Landlord's bona fide need for premises‑Landlord getting cabin vacated about 1 years back and renting it out again‑Contention that landlord's son could have set up business by utilizing cabin, repelled‑Held; ejectment can be granted on ground of personal need on fresh cause of action even if landlord previously got possession of a tenement and relet it.

Nooruddin and others' case 1968 S C M R 1087 rel.

(d) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (V1 of 1959)‑---

‑‑ S. 13 (3) (a) (ii) read with Sind Rental Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979). S. 15 (2) (vii)‑Landlord's requirement of shop in good faith‑No evidence on record to show either landlord's or his son's finances to start business of cloth‑Held, not neces sary for landlord to produce evidence of availability of funds unless such plea taken by tenant specifically in his written state ment necessitating recording of evidence on point‑Further held, not necessary for landlord to produce such evidence voluntarily.

Sh. Muhammad Usman for Appellant.

Khuda Bux Omrani for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 9th December, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Dera Murad Jamali lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.