Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR ADAMJEE versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.

Section 9 suit for recovery of loan amount, leave for defense claim, defendant's plea that his signature on the bail-out page was not in his personal capacity, but the management of the principal borrower company As the director was and the legal status of the defendants was not clear, such evidence would require proof of determination. While granting leave to defend this case, the legislature did not attach any conditions to the arbitration exercise of the bankruptcy court. Provided that the plaintiff has been given an untimely leave by the plaintiff

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• NOOR JAHAN alias BHOORI v. Mst. ANJUM MUGHEES 2009 MLD 645
• BACHAL v. State 2009 PCrLJ 646
• Master MUHAMMADULLAH v. KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION 2009 MLD 652
• MUBARAK ALI RAJPUT v. CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI 2009 PLC(CS) 654
• KHALIL AHMED v. Moulana Shaikh MUHAMMAD KHALIL 2009 MLD 655
• NAZIR AHMED BHUTTO v. State 2009 YLR 657
• ASGHAR ALI v. State 2009 PCrLJ 660
• AMEEN RIAZ v. ALZAMIN LEASING MODARBA 2009 CLD 661

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

patent advocate from Hub Chowki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes