RETEX GLOBAL (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus EXPORT PROCESSING ZONES AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Section 24 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Section 34 Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42 Arbitration Agreement, Absence of Trial Release Rule In plaintiffs' filed cases, authorities tried to stop the proceedings and the case. Cited Plaintiffs to be Raised by the Plaintiff. It was that there was no arbitration agreement between the parties, so the proceedings could not be stopped. The justification did not have to be that the arbitration agreement had to be executed in a formal document or any agreement must include the arbitration clause in it. The arbitration clause required that if the parties did not intend such disclosure in the document and the correspondence between the parties was not required, then the arbitration agreement could be reduced in writing and signed by the parties. Was needed. The arbitrator, what was the intent of the documents? Authorities covered section 24 (1) of the Export Processing Zone Authority Ordinance 1980 for investment in the industrial sector created by the plaintiffs, signatories of the document were bound by the rules and regulations contained in the Export Processing Zone Authority Rules 1981 , And may not take a moment to dispute the request for arbitration later
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
