Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Maintaining a Constitutional Request Obtaining Financial Assistance The default financial facilities for payment of arrears were used by all applicants, but huge amounts were left against them. However, at the time, the adjustments that were made were the payoffers who were defaulters and failed to pay the various types of services / loan arrears provided by the bank, if they were to receive markups or receive more than interest. When a dispute arises in the series, they were trying to avoid their responsibilities. And, upon the agreement reached between the parties, the applicant is to be treated before the Banking Court. And / or if there is a mistake or omission in any of the defamatory, arbitrary or discriminatory conduct by the banking laws, rules, guidelines or banks / financial institutions, effective before the banking ombudsman set out in section 8282. By the way was available to applicants. The ordinance of the banking companies, which had the jurisdiction to look into the grievance of the bereaved, the constitutional petition was not an effective remedy. The constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court was an equitable remedy provided in the relief of justice and not with the help of the unjust. Not exercising the jurisdiction of the Constitution to avoid its outstanding obligations In the High Court, litigation was not only a matter of time, but also had a negative impact on the business environment Constitution r \ nA constitutional application was rejected. ?
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
