Section 115 of the High Court Scope was considered to be an interference by the High Court only because of the jurisdiction and the provisions of Article 115, the CPC, only the jurisdiction, ie if a court has jurisdiction under the High Court. Was not used in this. Or when a court had jurisdiction to decide a question, it had jurisdiction to decide both the fact and the law, but its decision was wrong in law. There is no money for illegal or corrupt exercise of jurisdiction; for an applicant to succeed under section 115, CPC, he had to demonstrate that there was no way to reach that wrong decision. There is a flaw in the procedure, or there is some difference between the jurisdiction. Try to resolve a case and there should be wrong conclusions of law or facts under the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the court, not through a review, which is primarily a question of the jurisdiction of the court. Are related. Whether a court exercises jurisdiction in which it has not exercised its jurisdiction, or exercises any jurisdiction established therein, or exercises a stable jurisdiction. No application was found for illegal or material misappropriation of the applicant, justifying interference by the High Court in the exercise of the powers under Section 115, CPC. Done
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
