Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MASROOR HASAN versus ABBAS ALI KHAN


Section 13 (2) (ii) (a) Appellant No.1 (the tenant) in the shop as a Homeo Perth under pressure from the Appellant No. 2 is rented without the permission of the plaintiff (landlord). , Once the landlord proved another body by using rent. Tents either exclusively or jointly with the tenant, the burden of proof shifts on the tenant to explain the relationship between it and the test user [burden of proof]

1981 C L C 669

[Karachi]

Before Ajmal Mian, J

MASROOR HASAN AND ANOTHER‑‑Appellants

versus

ABBAS ALI KHAN‑Respondent

Second Appeal No. 42 of 1978, decided on 7th December, 1980.

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

S. 13(2)(ii)(a)‑Subletting‑Burden of proof‑Appellant No. 2 carrying on practice as Homoeopath in shop rented to appellant No. 1 (tenant) without permission of respondent (landlord)‑Held, once landlord proves some body else using rented premises either exclusively or jointly with tenant, burden of proof shifts on tenant to explain relationship between him and user of tenement.‑[Burden of proof].

(b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

S. 15(4), Explanation read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 100‑Concurrent finding of fact‑Concurrent finding of two Courts below on question of subletting neither perverse nor contrary to record‑‑Held, High Court cannot interfere with concurrent finding of fact in second appeal even if such finding seems erroneous.‑[Finding ; ;' of fact].

Abdul Majid and others v. Khalil Ahmed P L D 1955 F C 38 ref,

(c) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

‑‑ S. 13(3)(b)‑Landlord's claim for personal requirement‑Controller's satisfaction of bona fides of‑Respondent (landlord) filing application for ejectment of other tenant from another shop on ground of personal requirement ‑ Rent Controller dismissing application First Appellate Court and High Court upholding order of Rent Controller‑Held, record of this case cannot be looked into for purpose of deciding present case because two cases neither consolidated nor evidence in one case ordered to be read as part of evidence in other case and vice versa.

Zafar Alam Khan for Appellants.

Nizamuddin Qureshi and Ismail Padhiar for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 7th December, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.