Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT versus MUHAMMAD JAFFAR

Section 13 (3) Service of Notice of Student Evidence Proof In order to prove the service of such notice, the pre-emptor was legally obliged to keep on record confession with the postal receipt of such notice and the two true witnesses in the evidence Presenting it will not be completed. Such legal liability by the pre-importer will have its own effect in accordance with the facts of each case principles.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• ALAMGIR KHALID CHUGHTAI v. State 2009 PLD 254
• MUHAMMAD UMER RATHORE v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 CLD 257
• MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ KHAN v. State 2009 YLR 257
• ATTA ULLAH alias HASNAIN alias HASSAN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 257
• EXECUTIVE ENGINEER v. AKHTAR ABBAS 2009 PLC 259
• LIAQAT KHAN v. NASREEN BIBI 2009 MLD 260
• GENUINE IMPORT IMPEX through Proprietor v. DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, (APPRAISEMENT GROUP-III), LAHORE 2009 PTD 263
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. SHER MUHAMMAD 2009 PLD 263

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

online advocate from Farooqabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes