Section 5 and Schedule Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Suit / Impact Suit for Recovery of Delay Restitution Allowance in Appeal for Rehabilitation of Wife and Children Against Father Was. The plaintiff's appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by defendant because of the decision to dismiss the case in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant submitted that the appellate court had not erroneously justified it on the basis of the limitation, which he was well aware of. With the approval of the verdict and the decree, it remained silent for more than five months and thereafter an application was made to obtain a certified copy of the decision. The defendant could not specify the required delay by law in filing a request for a certified copy. The filing of an appeal before every day's judicial delay should be explained in accordance with the law, whereas at present, if the defendant fails to explain the delay for one day, then the defendant, who was the husband and father of the defendant, will be retained. To keep the law.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
