Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HABIB versus HAJI MUHAMMAD


Schedule of Reading with the Permanent Transfer (Houses and Shops) Rules, 1961, RR 6 and 7 PTD (Permanent Transfer Procedure), Settlement Rule 6 and 7 of the Settlement to deal with the title of the property Authorities were left with no option that has already been approved. Power to be used under RR 6 & 7, albeit otherwise, to exchange under a PTD in order to convert such PTD into a different, different, misrepresentation or fraud. If it does, it cannot increase its commitment to the question of entitlement. No part of the property has been transferred by PTD

1981 C L C 543

[Karachi]

Before Zaffar Hussain Mirza, J

Haji HABIB‑Petitioner

versus

HAJI MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Constitutional Petition No. 863 of 1975, decided on 10th May, 1980.

(a) Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)‑

‑‑ Sched. read with Permanent Transfer (Houses and Shops) Rules, 1961, rr. 6 & 7‑‑P. T. D. (Permanent Transfer Deed)‑ Re-determination of entitlement‑Rules 6 & 7 having been deleted no power left with Settlement authorities to deal with property title to which already passed on to transferee under a P. T. D. so as to alter, vary or, amend such P. T. D. even on ground of misrepresentation or fraud‑Power to be exercised under rr. 6 & 7, even otherwise, held, does not extend to re-determination of question of entitlement to any portion of property transferred by means of a P. T. D.

Anwar Hussain v. Sarfaraz Ahmed P L D 1971 S C 669 ref.

(b) Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)‑

‑‑ Sched. read with Permanent Transfer (Houses and Shops) Rules, 1961, rr. 6 & 7‑P. T. D. (Permanent Transfer Deed)‑ Re-determination of entitlement‑Settlement authority not empowered to adjudicate question of transfer after issuance of P. T. D. by means of inquiry and his jurisdiction extended only to correction of errors.‑[Jurisdiction].

Mian Muhammad Din v. Sh. Muhammad Ishaque Gaba P L D 1965 Lab 507 ref.

(c) Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)‑

‑‑ Sched. read with Permanent Transfer (Houses and Shops) Rules, 1961, rr. 6 & 7‑Disputed roof intended by evacuee owner to be used as roof of tenement beneath and as courtyard of first floor Matter, held, to be decided by Settlement authorities whether such roof be exclusive property of petitioner or be treated as common property of both parties and be used only as courtyard of third floor.

Akhtar Mahmood for Petitioner.

Ismail Munshi for Respondent No. 1.

Respondent No. 2 (absent) .

Date of hearing : 9th April, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Rohri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.