Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NIZAMUDDINYAHYA versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, SIND


Para 10, read with the Sindh Land Commission Notification No. SLC / 3668/72/5317, dated 9.10 The acquisition of land by a public servant in 1973, the applicant's interest in inheriting his father's interest in 1945. The presentation I received was justified in this case. His own claim is confirmed after his death due to his independent entitlement to the late name, though technically his father once owned it.

1981 C 536

[Karachi]

Before S. A. Nusrat and Abdul Hafeez Memon, JJ

NIZAMUDDIN YAHYA AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

versus

ADDITIONAL CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, SIND AND 3 OTHERS‑

Respondents

Constitutional Petition No. 1459 of 1974, decided on 5th July, 1980.

(a) Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 [M. L. R. 1151]‑

Para. 10 read with Sind Land Commission Notification No. SLC/3668/72/5317, dated 9‑10‑1973‑Acquisition of land by Government servant‑Deceased, petitioners' predecessor‑in‑interest inheriting land from his father in 1945‑Deceased as from 1945 becoming vested with a right of his own‑‑Claim verified in deceased's name after Partition Verified by virtue of his independent entitlement technically though in relation to land once owned by his father‑Land purchased by deceased on instalment basis under M. L. R. 91‑Held, land acquired by himself.

(b) Land Reforms Regulation, 1971 [M. L. R. 115]‑

‑‑‑‑ Para. 10 and Sind Land Commission Notification No. SLC/ 3668/72/837, dated 26‑2‑1973‑Proceedings determining holding not finalised and still pending and deceased himself keeping proceeding going by challenging order of Land Commission in revision‑Contention that Chief Land Commissioner left with no locus poenttintiae after passing of order by Land Commissioner on basis of Notification No. SLC/ 3668/72/837 dated 26‑2‑1973, held, without force.‑[Locus poenitentiae].

Shahbaz v. Crown P L L 1956 F C 46 and Pakistan v. Muhammad Himayatullah P L D 1969 S C 407 ref.

Pakistan v. Hassanali P L D 1960 S C 310 ; G. L. Bhattacharya v. State P L D 1964 S C 503 and Land Customs v. Azizuddin Industries Limited P L D 1970 S C 439 distinguished.

(c) Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 [M. L. R. 115]‑

‑‑ Para. 4, clause 8 and Sind Land Commission Notification No. LC/3668/72/5317 dated 9‑1‑1973 ‑Notification issued under para. 4(8)‑To be treated as 'part of Regulation and have effect accord‑‑Notification, held, became effective with Regulation, question of retrospective operation not arising.

S. Mushtaq Hussain for Petitioners.

Usman Ghani Rashid, A: G. for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 4th February, 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Kohat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.